Difference between revisions of "Roadways: Design Storm"
(Created page with "{| class="wikitable" |- | colspan="3" | '''Design Storm''' |- | colspan="3" | =Primary Guidance= **Provide a minimum bridge clear roadway width so the bridge is not classifie...") |
|||
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| colspan="3" | | | colspan="3" | | ||
=Primary Guidance= | =Primary Guidance= | ||
− | * | + | *Size bridges and culverts to safely pass the design year storm without overtopping as based upon the roadway functional classification and risk assessment |
− | + | *A [http://www.gishydro.eng.umd.edu/sha_april2016/Ch11_160406.pdf scour evaluation] is required for bridges and bottomless culverts over a waterway | |
− | * | + | *See Bridge – Stream Crossing for bridges and large culverts |
− | * | + | *See Drainage/Hydraulics – Culverts for small culverts |
− | |||
− | |||
− | * | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="3" | | | colspan="3" | | ||
Line 21: | Line 18: | ||
Allowable roadway overtopping is based upon the roadway classification, the level of risk associated with culvert and roadway failure, potential backwater increases, possible redirection of floodwaters, FEMA floodplains location, and an economic assessment or analysis justifying flood frequencies different than the minimum flood frequencies listed below. | Allowable roadway overtopping is based upon the roadway classification, the level of risk associated with culvert and roadway failure, potential backwater increases, possible redirection of floodwaters, FEMA floodplains location, and an economic assessment or analysis justifying flood frequencies different than the minimum flood frequencies listed below. | ||
− | AASHTO Classification | + | {| class="wikitable" |
− | + | ! AASHTO Classification | |
− | + | ! Design Storm Frequency | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | | Interstate,other Freeways, and Expressways and Principal Arterials | |
− | + | | 100 Year | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Intermediate and Minor Arterials | ||
+ | | 50 Year | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Collectors | ||
+ | | 25 Year | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Local Roads | ||
+ | | 10 Year | ||
+ | |} | ||
At a minimum, size structures to preclude overtopping by the design storm for the roadway classification. Design exceptions may be granted on a case-by-case basis in instances where overtopping is considered low-risk, when there is no history of overtopping, or when based on value-engineering. Site conditions, such as existing development, may also constrain solutions that do not meet the design storm, resulting in in-kind replacements. | At a minimum, size structures to preclude overtopping by the design storm for the roadway classification. Design exceptions may be granted on a case-by-case basis in instances where overtopping is considered low-risk, when there is no history of overtopping, or when based on value-engineering. Site conditions, such as existing development, may also constrain solutions that do not meet the design storm, resulting in in-kind replacements. | ||
− | In addition, | + | In addition, hydrology and hydraulic analyses must comply with COMAR 26.17.04 regarding impacts to floodplains. Water surface increases must be limited to 0.1 ft. on improved properties; up to 1.0 ft. on unimproved properties with property owner notification and/or concurrence and mitigation. If the structure is within a FEMA floodplain, the water surface increase must be kept to 0.00 ft. |
==Scour== | ==Scour== | ||
− | A scour evaluation or assessment must be performed and approved for any bridge or bottomless culvert over a waterway that is to be rehabilitated or replaced with federal or State funds. Structures with paved bottoms (pipes, pipe arches, box culverts, etc.) do not require a scour evaluation. A scour evaluation is a detailed scour study to estimate scour depths at substructure foundations, and a scour assessment consists of a field and office review of plans and records to determine the degree of risk of scour damage. If the scour damage risk is low, no further study is needed. If the risk is high, detailed scour evaluations or additional studies are needed. Action is needed to address and minimize the potential for scour damage and resulting risk to the public. Scour evaluations should be performed for the 100 year storm regardless of the roadway functional classification. This is to ensure that the bridge will not wash out in a major storm event, which can lead to a loss of life. The resulting cost increase to the substructure foundations are significantly lower than the cost of replacing an entire bridge. | + | A [http://www.gishydro.eng.umd.edu/sha_april2016/Ch11_160406.pdf scour evaluation or assessment] must be performed and approved for any bridge or bottomless culvert over a waterway that is to be rehabilitated or replaced with federal or State funds. Structures with paved bottoms (pipes, pipe arches, box culverts, etc.) do not require a scour evaluation. A scour evaluation is a detailed scour study to estimate scour depths at substructure foundations, and a scour assessment consists of a field and office review of plans and records to determine the degree of risk of scour damage. If the scour damage risk is low, no further study is needed. If the risk is high, detailed scour evaluations or additional studies are needed. Action is needed to address and minimize the potential for scour damage and resulting risk to the public. Scour evaluations should be performed for the 100 year storm regardless of the roadway functional classification. This is to ensure that the bridge will not wash out in a major storm event, which can lead to a loss of life. The resulting cost increase to the substructure foundations are significantly lower than the cost of replacing an entire bridge. |
Line 38: | Line 45: | ||
=See Also= | =See Also= | ||
− | *[[ | + | *[[Roadways: Shoulder Width|Shoulder Width]] |
*[[Practical Design Implementation Guidance|Practical Design Implementation Guidance]] | *[[Practical Design Implementation Guidance|Practical Design Implementation Guidance]] |
Latest revision as of 17:12, 11 December 2024
Design Storm | ||||||||||||
ContentsPrimary Guidance
| ||||||||||||
DiscussionDesign Storm for Bridges and Culverts over WaterwaysAllowable roadway overtopping is based upon the roadway classification, the level of risk associated with culvert and roadway failure, potential backwater increases, possible redirection of floodwaters, FEMA floodplains location, and an economic assessment or analysis justifying flood frequencies different than the minimum flood frequencies listed below.
At a minimum, size structures to preclude overtopping by the design storm for the roadway classification. Design exceptions may be granted on a case-by-case basis in instances where overtopping is considered low-risk, when there is no history of overtopping, or when based on value-engineering. Site conditions, such as existing development, may also constrain solutions that do not meet the design storm, resulting in in-kind replacements. In addition, hydrology and hydraulic analyses must comply with COMAR 26.17.04 regarding impacts to floodplains. Water surface increases must be limited to 0.1 ft. on improved properties; up to 1.0 ft. on unimproved properties with property owner notification and/or concurrence and mitigation. If the structure is within a FEMA floodplain, the water surface increase must be kept to 0.00 ft. ScourA scour evaluation or assessment must be performed and approved for any bridge or bottomless culvert over a waterway that is to be rehabilitated or replaced with federal or State funds. Structures with paved bottoms (pipes, pipe arches, box culverts, etc.) do not require a scour evaluation. A scour evaluation is a detailed scour study to estimate scour depths at substructure foundations, and a scour assessment consists of a field and office review of plans and records to determine the degree of risk of scour damage. If the scour damage risk is low, no further study is needed. If the risk is high, detailed scour evaluations or additional studies are needed. Action is needed to address and minimize the potential for scour damage and resulting risk to the public. Scour evaluations should be performed for the 100 year storm regardless of the roadway functional classification. This is to ensure that the bridge will not wash out in a major storm event, which can lead to a loss of life. The resulting cost increase to the substructure foundations are significantly lower than the cost of replacing an entire bridge.
|