Difference between revisions of "Roadways: Park & Ride Facilities"
From MDOT Policy Manual
Beichhorst (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
− | + | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
Line 8: | Line 6: | ||
= Primary Guidance = | = Primary Guidance = | ||
:* Planned facility size must reflect the anticipated regional growth and its impact to parking space demand, not to exceed 20 years. | :* Planned facility size must reflect the anticipated regional growth and its impact to parking space demand, not to exceed 20 years. | ||
− | :* Evaluate the facility size and design based on factors such as: current space occupancy, design vehicle, transit service levels and ridership, appropriate amenities at the facility, and local area characteristics and issues. | + | :* Evaluate the facility size and design based on factors such as: current space occupancy, design vehicle, both existing and known transit service levels and ridership, appropriate amenities at the facility, and local area characteristics and issues. |
:* Should have good visibility and access, preferably within 0.5 mile of a major roadway. | :* Should have good visibility and access, preferably within 0.5 mile of a major roadway. | ||
Line 15: | Line 13: | ||
| colspan="3" | | | colspan="3" | | ||
= Discussion = | = Discussion = | ||
− | :* Park & Ride facilities are an integral component of the overall transportation system. They are used by local and regional transit riders as well as travelers participating in carpool and vanpool programs (travel demand management). Truck drivers also use designated Park & Ride facilities to rest. | + | :* Park & Ride facilities are an integral component of the overall transportation system. They are used by local and regional transit riders as well as travelers participating in carpool and vanpool programs (travel demand management). Truck drivers also use specifically designated Park & Ride facilities to rest. |
== Size Consideration == | == Size Consideration == | ||
Line 22: | Line 20: | ||
::* Forecasted: | ::* Forecasted: | ||
:::* Regional growth and demand. | :::* Regional growth and demand. | ||
− | :::* | + | :::* Existing and proposed transit service levels. |
::* Proposed lot functions, such as: car pool needs, commuter bus, transit connectivity, freight parking, and community purposes (recreational field parking, fairgrounds parking, etc.). | ::* Proposed lot functions, such as: car pool needs, commuter bus, transit connectivity, freight parking, and community purposes (recreational field parking, fairgrounds parking, etc.). | ||
::* Demand for truck parking along a corridor. | ::* Demand for truck parking along a corridor. | ||
Line 31: | Line 29: | ||
:* Parking garages are typically much more expensive to construct and maintain than at-grade lots. Therefore, at-grade lots must always be the first option considered unless it: | :* Parking garages are typically much more expensive to construct and maintain than at-grade lots. Therefore, at-grade lots must always be the first option considered unless it: | ||
::* Requires prohibitive right of way costs and impacts. | ::* Requires prohibitive right of way costs and impacts. | ||
− | ::* Requires significant negative impacts to the natural environment. | + | ::* Requires significant negative impacts to the natural environment including flooding considerations. |
::* Foregoes an opportunity for a more desirable land use (e.g. Transit Oriented Development). | ::* Foregoes an opportunity for a more desirable land use (e.g. Transit Oriented Development). | ||
Line 46: | Line 44: | ||
− | [[Category:Practical Design Guidance | + | [[Category:Practical Design Guidance]] |
Revision as of 18:52, 7 September 2017
ContentsPrimary Guidance
| ||
Discussion
Size Consideration
Structure Considerations
Component Considerations
Right-of-Way Considerations
|