Difference between revisions of "Roadways: Pavement Methods/Friction Surface Treatments"
(Created page with "{| class="wikitable" |- | colspan="3" | '''Bridge Width''' |- | colspan="3" | =Primary Guidance= *Roadways with high accident rate spot locations and any areas with short-rad...") |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="3" | | | colspan="3" | | ||
− | ''' | + | '''Pavement Methods/Friction Surface Treatments''' |
|- | |- | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
=See Also= | =See Also= | ||
*[[Practical Design Implementation Guidance|Practical Design Implementation Guidance]] | *[[Practical Design Implementation Guidance|Practical Design Implementation Guidance]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Practical Design]][[Category:Practical Design Guidance]] |
Latest revision as of 20:06, 5 December 2016
Pavement Methods/Friction Surface Treatments | ||
Primary Guidance
| ||
DiscussionHFST is an excellent surface treatment to get very high skid resistance. While it is much more expensive than other surface treatments, it is much more effective in accident reduction and significantly cheaper than geometric realignment involving reconstruction. It is intended for spot locations (less than 1,000 ft.) on tight curves or approaches requiring hard braking, and where accidents have been an issue. Surface abrasion and micro-surfacing are not nearly expensive as HFST, and their skid resistance is not as high. They are intended for high-radius horizontal curves or areas where there is a moderate friction demand, and the pavement friction values are declining. Because of the equipment required for these treatments, they are more cost-effective in larger quantities. These treatments are intended to keep the surface friction condition sufficiently good so that an accident trend does not develop. |